{"id":151,"date":"2008-04-17T10:23:54","date_gmt":"2008-04-17T10:23:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/17\/watching-out-for-the-weasel-words\/"},"modified":"2021-06-29T12:40:41","modified_gmt":"2021-06-29T16:40:41","slug":"watching-out-for-the-weasel-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/2008\/04\/17\/watching-out-for-the-weasel-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Watching out for the weasel words"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.poconorecord.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20080217\/NEWS04\/802170324\">Oh, the irony of the background check!<\/a>&#8221; was the headline on a story in the Pocono Record in February. One of their readers offered the following.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A few months ago, I applied for a job at the new distribution center in Gouldsboro. I had the interview, got hired, passed the urine test, then they do a background check which they find a misdemeanor theft charge from two years ago, which was over some coins. I was accused of stealing, but since I was there, I could not prove I did not. Anyway, they told me they could not hire me.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Let&#8217;s look at this because it illustrates some issues about hiring that are important. Wording is a good place to begin.<\/p>\n<p>The person refers to &#8220;misdemeanor theft charge from two years ago, which was over some coins.&#8221; Clearly he&#8217;s trying to put things in the best light. In the ad business those would be called &#8220;weasel words.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It may have been a misdemeanor, but it was probably a conviction, not just a charge. Certain criminal databases, like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/\">SentryLink<\/a>, that businesses use for background checks don&#8217;t note arrests or charges, only convictions. That&#8217;s how we interpret the Constitution&#8217;s principle of &#8220;innocent until proven guilty.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t know how many coins were involved and we don&#8217;t know if they were currency or collectables. What we do know is that stealing was involved and the fact that it was two years ago is irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>If I&#8217;m the hiring manager, here&#8217;s how my reasoning would go. &#8220;We&#8217;re considering this guy for a job at a distribution center where he&#8217;ll have access to lots of things he can steal. He&#8217;s stolen before. I think we&#8217;ll hire someone else.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Everybody tries to portray themselves in the best possible way. But some people step over the line and use &#8220;weasel words&#8221; to misrepresent their situation. A charge and a conviction, for example, are two very different things. That&#8217;s why we have background checks. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Oh, the irony of the background check!&#8221; was the headline on a story in the Pocono Record in February. One of their readers offered the following. A few months ago, I applied for a job at the new distribution center in Gouldsboro. I had the interview, got hired, passed the urine test, then they do a background check which they find a misdemeanor theft charge from two years ago, which was over some coins. I was accused of stealing, but since I was there, I could not prove I did not. Anyway, they told me they could not hire me. Let&#8217;s look at this because it illustrates some issues about hiring that are important. Wording is a good place to begin. The person refers to &#8220;misdemeanor theft charge from two years ago, which was over some coins.&#8221; Clearly he&#8217;s trying to put things in the best light. In the ad business those would be called &#8220;weasel words.&#8221; It may have been a misdemeanor, but it was probably a conviction, not just a charge. Certain criminal databases, like SentryLink, that businesses use for background checks don&#8217;t note arrests or charges, only convictions. That&#8217;s how we interpret the Constitution&#8217;s principle of &#8220;innocent  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,3,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-criminal-checks","category-employment-screening","category-privacy"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=151"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":197,"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/151\/revisions\/197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sentrylink.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}